Combining Decision Procedures for Theories in Sorted Logics
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Nelson-Oppen combination method combines decision procedures for theories satisfying certain conditions into a decision procedure for their union. While the method is known to be correct in the setting of unsorted first-order logic, some current implementations of it appear in tools that use a sorted input language. So far, however, there have been no theoretical results on the correctness of the method in a sorted setting, nor it is obvious that the method in fact lifts as is to logics with sorts. To bridge this gap between the existing theoretical results and the current implementations, we extend the Nelson-Oppen method to (order-)sorted logic and prove it correct under conditions similar to the original ones. From a theoretical standpoint, the extension is relevant because it provides a rigorous foundation for the application of the method in a sorted setting. From a practical standpoint, the extension has the considerable added benefits that in a sorted setting the method’s preconditions become easier to satify in practice, and the method’s nondeterminism is generally reduced.
منابع مشابه
Combining Decision Procedures for Sorted Theories
The Nelson-Oppen combination method combines decision procedures for theories satisfying certain conditions into a decision procedure for their union. While the method is known to be correct in the setting of unsorted first-order logic, some current implementations of it appear in tools that use a sorted input language. So far, however, there have been no theoretical results on the correctness ...
متن کاملConnecting Many-Sorted Theories
Basically, the connection of two many-sorted theories is obtained by taking their disjoint union, and then connecting the two parts through connection functions that must behave like homomorphisms on the shared signature. We determine conditions under which decidability of the validity of universal formulae in the component theories transfers to their connection. In addition, we consider varian...
متن کاملA New Combination Procedure for the Word Problem That Generalizes Fusion Decidability Results in Modal Logics
Previous results for combining decision procedures for the word problem in the non-disjoint case do not apply to equational theories induced by modal logics—which are not disjoint for sharing the theory of Boolean algebras. Conversely, decidability results for the fusion of modal logics are strongly tailored towards the special theories at hand, and thus do not generalize to other types of equa...
متن کاملModular algorithms for heterogeneous modal logics via multi-sorted coalgebra
State-based systems and modal logics for reasoning about them often heterogeneously combine a number of features such as non-determinism and probabilities. Here, we show that the combination of features can be reflected algorithmically and develop modular decision procedures for heterogeneous modal logics. The modularity is achieved by formalizing the underlying state-based systems as multi-sor...
متن کاملOn Efficiently Integrating Boolean and Theory-Specific Solving Procedures
Efficient decision procedures have been conceived in different communities for a very heterogeneous collection of expressive decidable theories. However, despite in the last years we have witnessed an impressive advance in the efficiency of SAT procedures, techniques for efficiently integrating boolean reasoning and theory-specific decision procedures have been deeply investigated only recently...
متن کامل